Neoplasms

Nervous System Diseases

All Conditions

Brain Neoplasms

Supratentorial Neoplasms

Central Nervous System Neoplasms

Nervous System Neoplasms

Brain Diseases

Central Nervous System Diseases

Central Nervous System Depressants

All Drugs and Chemicals

Analgesics

Anesthetics

Dexmedetomidine

Hypnotics and Sedatives

Analgesics, Non-Narcotic

Adrenergic Agents

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists

Adrenergic Agonists

Neurotransmitter Agents

S group : dexmedetomidine is infused intravenously at a dose of 0.4 ug/kg

M group: dexmedetomidine is infused intravenously at a dose of 0.8 ug/kg

P group: normal saline is infused intravenously

2 ml of dexmedetomidine at a concentration of 100 ug/ml is diluted by 98 ml normal saline to a concentration of 2 ug/ml. The required amount of experimental drugs is confirmed according to the weight and grouping, and diluted using normal saline to 20 ml.

dexmedetomidine

normal saline

Yue Yun, Master

Ling Pei, Ph.D.

Ling Pei

An excellent recovery profile is critical for neurosurgical anesthesia. Rapid awakening, smooth blood pressure and heart rate (HR), a higher degree of coordination, painless or mild pain, as well as better tolerance to endotracheal intubation can avoid can increased intracranial pressure, elevated blood pressure and rapid HR caused by emergency choking, suffocation and agitation, and can reduce postoperative cerebral edema and the risk of bleeding. In addition, it is easy for surgeons to timely evaluate postoperative patients' neurologic function based on the excellent recovery from anesthesia. Up to now, there are many methods and drugs to improve the quality of recovery period, but each of them has some flaws. Dexmedetomidine, an emerging anesthetic adjuvant, exhibits a stable hemodynamic recovery period, and cannot affect evaluation of neurological function with both the sedative and analgesic effects. We propose the following hypotheses: (1) A small dose of dexmedetomidine can be intravenously injected into patients subjected to craniotomy under general anesthesia, in order to improve the recovery profiles and reduce the incidence of emergence agitation. (2) Dexmedetomidine can reduce postoperative pain.

Study Arm(s):

Enrollment There are totally 150 cases, 50 cases in each group. At least 120 cases complete the test.

Randomized grouping Under the guidance of a drug administrator, the different drug and control groups are randomly encoded. Each code has a corresponding emergency envelope. Blind codes are saved by the drug administrator.

Interventions :

Experimental Drugs Dexmedetomidine (SFDA Approval No. H20090248), 200 ug/2 ml, provided by the Central Pharmacy of the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University and produced by Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Ltd., China.

Normal saline, 100 ml per bag, provided by the the Central Pharmacy of the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University.

Experimental Procedures:

Background Information: Dexmedetomidine is an α-adrenoceptor agonist, and its chemical name is (+)-4-(S)-\[1-(2,3-dimethylphenyl ) ethyl\]-1H-imidazole hydrochloride. Its structure and pharmacological activity are similar to clonidine. Dexmedetomidine was developed by the Orion Pharma (Finland) Corporation and Abott (USA), and introduced to China in 2009 (trade name: Ai Beining). Preclinical studies have shown that, like clonidine, dexmedetomidine is an agonist of α2-adrenergic receptors, and exhibits effectiveness about 10 times more than clonidine. Originally developed as an antihypertensive drug, dexmedetomidine functions in lowering blood pressure and HR, and is found to have a powerful anesthetic effect. Up to now, dexmedetomidine has been widely used in general anesthesia, monitored anesthesia care (MAC), ICU sedation. Dexmedetomidine is a sedative, hypnotic, analgesic, anti-sympathetic medication, and uniquely characterized as "cooperative sedation" and "no respiratory depression".

In the present study, we compare the hemodynamic effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine via intraoperative infusion, and explore the effects of dexmedetomidine on recovery profiles from general anesthesia and postoperative pain.

Experimental Protocol:

This study is a randomized double-blinded trial. All the subjects are supratentorial brain tumors patients with ASA I \& II. Within 24 hours before surgery, preoperative visits are conducted to obtain signed informed consents. The patient's height, weight, blood pressure (including SBP, DBP and mean arterial pressure (MAP)), HR, oxygen saturation (SpO2) are recorded as the baseline value (BV).

Patients are subjected to electrocardiograph monitoring, including non-invasive blood pressure, ECG, and SpO2.

Anesthesia is orderly induced by a combined infusion of propofol 2-2.5 mg/kg, sufentanil 0.3-0.5 ug/kg, and cis-atracurium 0.15-0.2 mg/kg, and the tracheal intubation is completed until the maximal muscle relaxant effect.

Before surgery, arterial and central venous catheterization is completed for continuous monitoring of the patient's arterial pressure and central venous pressure (CVP). Intraoperative CVP is maintained at 4-6 cmH2O.

Anesthesia is maintained at a manner of inhalation anesthesia with 0.8-1.5% sevoflurane and continuous intravenous infusion of propofol and remifentanil respectively at a speed of 3-5 mg/kg/h and 0.01-0.02 mg /kg/h. The drug dose is adjusted hemodynamically to maintain MAP values at a range of 60-90 mmHg.

After craniectomy, additional cis-atracurium 0.05-0.08 mg/kg is added every 45-60 minutes by the end of dural suturing. Sufentanil (0.15-0.2 ug/kg) is given intravenously instead of inhalation anesthesia, and meanwhile, 20% -30% dose of intravenous anesthesia is added. After skin closure (approximately 30 minutes before the end of surgery), continuous infusion of propofol is terminated, and remifentanil infusion is stopped after surgery. Intraoperative dexamethasone (20 mg) is routinely used for prevention of cerebral edema, 10 mg is administered intravenously before surgery (10 mg), and then an additional 10 mg injected after 2 hours or by the end of surgery.

Infusion principles: before anesthesia, crystalloid solution is dropped at a speed of 8-10 ml/kg/h. After the start of anesthesia, the infusion speed is adjusted to 5ml/kg/h. The dose of artificial colloids is less than 20 ml/kg. The infusion volume is adjusted based on the amount of fluid input and output.

Experimental drugs are infused via the syringe pump approximately 1 hour before the end of surgery, i.e., at the end of dural suturing, at a speed of 2 ml/min, i.e., 120 ml/h.

Criteria for extubation: a. recovery of spontaneous breathing; b. over 95% SpO2; c. patients can complete the instructions (eye opening to voice).

Criteria for discharge from the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU): a. 1\<= RASS score\> = -2; b. in the case of oxygen inhalation via a nasal catheter at a flow rate of 3-5 L/min, SpO2 can maintain above 95%; c. the observation time after extubation is \> = 30 minutes.

Medical equipments used in surgery: GE healthcare SolarTM8000M/i Patient Monitor; GE healthcare Smart Anesthesia Multi-gas SAMTM/SAM-80 Module (multi-gas analyzer); Drager Fabius GS; JMS syringe pump (SP-500).

Medical equipments used in PACU: GE healthcare B30 Patient Monitor; NHI ventilator (Newport Medical Instruments, Inc., USA).

Medical equipments used in Neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU): GE Dash 2500 Monitor; GEM Premier 3000 blood gas analyzer.

Adverse Events:

All the adverse events occur after drug administration, which may be unrelated to drug treatment.

Observation and recording of adverse effects Careful inquiry and tracing is necessary for all the adverse events during the experiment, including laboratory abnormalities. All adverse events must be judged by their nature, severity and correlation with drug treatment, which should be strictly recorded in the case report form.

Correlation assessment Correlations between adverse events and experimental medication are as follows: definitely related, probably related, possibly related, possibly unrelated, certainly unrelated. The incidence of adverse reactions is calculated based on three conditions described as definitely related, probably related, and possibly related. Specific criteria are seen in Appendix 1.

Severity assessment

Severity of adverse events is divided into three levels:

Mild: Treatment is usually not necessary for a transient increase in blood pressure and decrease in HR, because the subject is under anesthesia.

Moderate: The bolus injection of atropine 0.3-1 mg is given for sinus bradycardia and escape rhythm. If combination with hypotension, the bolus injection of ephedrine 10-15 mg can be applied.

Severe: For sinus standstill, cardiopulmonary resuscitation is applied if necessary.

Treatment for adverse events during and after the experiment Outcomes of all adverse events should be followed and recorded. The subject who withdraws from the experiment due to adverse events should be traced till the adverse events completed removed. Researchers must determine whether an adverse event is related to experimental drugs, and provide a basis to support this judgment.

Serious adverse events Definition: Adverse events occur during clinical trials that result in a series of serious consequences, including hospitalization, prolonging hospitalization, disability, affecting the ability to work, endangering the life or death, and congenital malformations.

Reporting of the serious adverse events: Serious adverse reactions should be reported to the team leader and sponsor within 24 hours, and the serious adverse event table should be filled.

Contacts: Yue Yun, +86 13889168717, Second Department of Anesthesiology First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, China Urgent Unblinding Method When serious adverse reactions appear during the experiment, if necessary, the study director can open the emergency envelope to carry out urgent unblinding strategy and record the relevant causes and date in the case report form. Whether the unblinded subjects withdraw from the experiment is decided by investigators and responsible party.

Data management and Statistical Analyses:

Statistical Description: Completed case report forms are collected by the clinical inspector and submitted to the responsible party for data processing.

After confirmation, the data from case report forms are locked into the database.

There are 3 groups when unblinding for the first time. Information description Count data are described using percentages, and measurement data expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Not normally distributed data are expressed as median and percentiles (25th-75th percentiles).

Comparison of baseline data Intergroup count data are compared using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. If measurement data normally distributed exhibit homogeneity of variance, single-factor or multi-factor analysis of variance is applied. If heterogeneity of variance is shown, non-parametric test or approximate test (e.g., Tamhnnes T2 test) is employed. For measurement data not normally distributed, non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskall-Wallis rank sum test is used. Baseline balance and comparability in each group is examined.

Comparison of Efficacy: Analgesic and sedative effects between groups are compared using Kruskall-Wallis rank sum test. For markedly effective, pairwise comparison in data differences between are analyzed using Mann-Whitney U non-parametric test. Considering the center or other factors, CMH X2 test is employed for comparison of two-classification index and level indicators.

Data Processing: All statistical data are analyzed using SAS software for data processing. Two-sided test is employed for statistical analysis, and the corresponding P values are given. For the Fisher's exact test, P value is calculated directly. A value of P \<0.05 is considered significant, and P \<0.01 considered highly significant.

Unblinding for the second time is carried out by the end of statistical analysis, and there are two experimental groups and one control group.

Quality Assurance and Quality Control:

Investigators In this clinical study, there are two responsible parties and five principal investigators. The clinical scheme is implemented strictly. An inspector is appointed to monitor the clinical trial at any time.

Quality Control of the measurement indexes The observation indexes are observed according to standard operating procedures and quality control procedures. National legal units of measurements are employed for various test items. The test report form must complete the Assay report card must have complete items, including the date, test items, test results and their normal range.

Ethical standards The study protocol, case report forms, informed consent should be approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University.

Investigators or investigator-authorized officers will be responsible to explain the benefits and risks of participating in the clinical trial for each patient, the patient's legal representative or notary witnesses. The written informed consent should be obtained prior to study entry (before screening test and drug administration).

All the patients or their legal representatives and personnel chairing the informed consent process sign their names and date to the informed consent. The original file is saved by the investigators.

Data retention The investigators should be responsible for the intact data intact, have a fixed place to store the data which are locked for future viewing. In accordance with the principles of GCP in China, the data should be kept for at least 5 years.

Small-dose Dexmedetomidine Effects on Recovery Profiles of Supratentorial Tumors Patients From General Anesthesia

Randomized, Parallelled and Double-blinded Trial of Small-dose Dexmedetomidine Effects on Recovery Profiles of Supratentorial Tumors Patients From General Anesthesia

Patients' SBP, DBP, MAP and HR are recorded before and every 5 minutes after drug intervention until recovery from anesthesia and removal of the tracheal intubation.

Record SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, and SpO2 values immediately after extubation. Record SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, and SpO2 values every 5 minutes after extubation. Record SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, and SpO2 values every 5 minutes after PACU entry. Record SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, and SpO2 values at 0, 60, 120 and 240 minutes after returning to the ward.

Record the patient's anesthesia time (from the anesthetic induction to termination of anesthetic infusion), operative time (from skin incision to the end of suturing), awakening time (from the end of surgery to eye opening in response to voices), spontaneous breathing recovery time (from the end of surgery to recovery of spontaneous breathing), extubation time (from the end of surgery to extubation).

Using Four-point subjective scale: 0 = no cough; 1 = mild cough; 2 = moderate cough; 3 = severe cough.

Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) is used for sedation assessment. Scores on RASS are recorded at tracheal extubation, every 5 minutes after extubation, and at 0, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes after returning to the ward.

If RASS\>=2 during emergence from general anesthesia, the bolus injection of propofol 1.5-2.5mg/kg can be applied when necessary.

Verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) is employed for assessment of pain intensity (PI). The scores range from 0-10: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, and 7-10 = severe pain.

In the operation room, the subject is asked to say the VNRS scores by the PACU nurse, and the score is recorded. The VNRS assessment is also conducted at 5, 15, 30 minutes after recovery from anesthesia, and at 0, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes after returning to the ward.

During emergence from general anesthesia, if VNRS score\> = 6 points, a single-dose bolus injection of sufentanil 5 ug is applied; if pain is not alleviated, sufentanil 5 ug can be given again after 5 minutes, and total dose does not exceed 10 ug.

When MAP\> 90 mmHg during maintenance of anesthesia, the amount of anesthetic drugs will be increased, i.e. the inhalation concentration of sevoflurane, propofol and/or remifentanil infusion dose. If the result is still not satisfactory, a single dose of nicardipine 0.5-1 mg via intravenous injection will be added.

When MAP \<60 mmHg, a single intravenous injection of ephedrine 5-10 mg can be given, while the value of MAP also can be adjusted by fluid replacement and reducing anesthetic doses (such as the inhalation concentration of sevoflurane, propofol, and/or remifentanil infusion dose) to adjust; if the effect is still not satisfactory, continuous infusion of 2% norepinephrine is recommended to maintain blood pressure in the target range.

When HR\> 90 beats/min or ST-T segment abnormalities on ECG appear during maintenance of anesthesia, a single dose of 5-10 mg esmolol can be given intravenously, and meanwhile, the fluid replacement is recommended. When HR \<45 beats/min, a single dose of 0.3-0.5 mg atropine can be given intravenously; if the result is not satisfactory and repeated administration is up to the maximum cumulative amount of 2 mg, isoproterenol 1 mg/500 ml can be given intravenously and the infusion speed can be adjusted based on HR.

If MAP\> BV +20% lasts more than 1 minute during anesthesia recovery period, a single-dose bolus injection of nicardipine 0.5-1mg is given; if the result is not satisfactory, repeated doses (nicardipine 10 mg/100 ml) and the infusion rate can be adjusted according to blood pressure values.

If MAP \<70 mmHg lasts more than 1 minute, a single-dose bolus injection of ephedrine 5-10 mg bolus is preferred, and meanwhile, the fluid replacement is also introduced under the premise of exclusion of cardiogenic shock; if necessary, continuous infusion of 2% norepinephrine can be given to maintain the blood pressure in the target range.

When HR\> 120 beats/min or ST-T segment abnormalities on ECG appear during anesthesia recovery period, a load dose of esmolol 5-10 mg is necessary followed by continuous intravenous infusion of esmolol 100 mg/100 ml to control HR. The infusion rate is adjusted according to the value of HR.

When HR \<45 beats/min, the bolus injection of atropine 0.3-0.5 mg is given; if the result is not satisfactory and repeated administration is up to the maximum cumulative amount of 2 mg, repeated administration to the maximum cumulative amount 2mg, the intravenous infusion of isoproterenol 1 mg/500 ml can be given and the infusion rate is adjusted according to the HR value.

If chills reaction appear when the patient emerges from general anesthesia, the intravenous injection of tramadol hydrochloride 0.1 g should be given slowly on the basis of heat preservation; if appearance of nausea and vomiting, the intravenous injection of tropisetron hydrochloride (Xinbei) 5 mg should be given.

Palinesthesia is evaluated by the surgeon based on a visual analogue scale VAS 0-10 points: 0=dissatisfied, 10=very satisfied.

China Medical University, China

Randomized, parallelled and double-blinded trial of small-dose dexmedetomidine effects on recovery profiles of supratentorial tumors patients from general anesthesia

Adjuvants, Anesthesia

Antipyretics

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents

Channel Blockers

Anticonvulsants

Reproductive Control Agents

Anti-Inflammatory Agents

Antirheumatic Agents

Fentanyl

Acetaminophen

Lidocaine

Ketamine

Magnesium Sulfate

Analgesics, Opioid

Ketorolac

Narcotics

patients are going to receive intraoperative analgesics other than opioids

patients are going to receive intraoperative opioid analgesics

Patients will receive over the 10 minutes prior to induction:

* Acetaminophen 1 gm i.v. infusion in 100ml over 10 minutes.
* Ketorolac 30 mg i.v. infusion in100 ml over 10 minutes.
* Mg SO4 loading dose 30 mg/kg i.v. infusion in 100 ml over 10 minutes.
* Dexmedetomidine loading dose 1 μg/kg i.v. infusion.
* Lidocaine loading dose 1.5 mg/kg i.v. infusion.
* Ketamine loading dose 0.25 mg/kg i.v. infusion.

The weight based doses of dexmedetomidine, lidocaine, ketamine will be prepared on 20 ml syringe and infused over 10 minutes prior to induction. In a dose of 0.1 ml/kg

Then after induction maintenance analgesic infusion will start in a rate that ranges from 0.025 to 0.05 ml/kg/h which is equivalent to:

* Dexmedetomidine 0.25-0.5 μg/kg/h
* Lidocaine 0.375-0.75 mg/kg/h
* Ketamine 0.0625- 0.125 mg/kg/h

Opioid free anesthetics

Placebo equivalent to acetaminophen, ketorolac, magnesium sulphate will be infused as 100 ml normal saline each over 10 minutes ,patients will receive fentanyl 2 μg/kg loading dose which will be prepared over 20 ml syringe and infused over 10 minutes prior to induction, Then after induction maintenance of analgesic infusion by fentanyl 0.5-1 μg/kg/h.

Opioid Anesthetics

Rania S Fahmy

Hemodynamic control during craniotomies can be a bit hectic specially during periods of intense noxious stimulation. For long anesthesiologists used high doses of opioids such as fentanyl and remifentanyl to provide analgesia with a good hemodynamic control during intraoperative period in patients undergoing craniotomies. However, the use of opioids was not devoid of side effects. Exploring other anesthetic plans using multiple opioid free anesthetic adjuvants that have analgesic effects given together in small doses appear to be appealing plan. This idea is the basis of our proposed study in which we compare the hemodynamic effects of using opioid free anesthesia versus opioid anesthesia in cranial surgeries.

Anesthesia for craniotomies can be very challenging because of the presence of periods of noxious stimuli that interposes with periods of little stimulation which makes hemodynamic control a little bit more complicated. Intraoperative episodes of hypertension during periods of intense stimulations and early postoperative hypertension may lead to serious complications as post craniotomy intracranial hemorrhage and vasogenic brain edema. Anesthetic techniques based on usage of high doses of potent opioid analgesics such as fentanyl and remifentanil have been widely popular among anesthesiologists. However, the intra operative use of large bolus doses or continuous infusions of potent opioids may be associated with postoperative hyperalgesia and increased analgesic consumption.

More recently, concerns have arisen about impaired healing,immunosuppression,and worsening of oncologic outcomes with systemic opioids. Another technique that started gaining its popularity is opioid free anesthesia (OFA) technique whose corner stone is depending on multiple anesthetic adjuvants that have analgesic effects, , therefore when given together in small doses they result in good anesthesia with less side effects and faster recovery compared with opioids. This technique has been successfully used in anesthesia for bariatric surgeries combining multiple drugs as dexmedetomidine, lidocaine, ketamine, ketorolac and magnesium.

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist with sedative, anxiolytic and analgesic properties that has minimal effects on respiratory drive. Although preoperative intravenous dexmedetomidine administration is associated with a reduction in postoperative pain intensity, analgesic consumption and nausea, the analgesic property of dexmedetomidine is less effective compared with opioids. Intravenous lidocaine has been described as having analgesic, anti-hyperalgesic, and anti-inflammatory properties. Intravenous lidocaine infusion in the perioperative period is safe and has clear advantages, such as decreased intra operative anesthetic requirements, lower pain scores, reduced postoperative analgesic requirements, as well as faster recovery. In addition to ketamine magnesium is also reported to enhance analgesia by blocking NMDA receptor, also magnesium has the properties of a sympatholytic and has been introduced as a safe component of balanced anesthesia.

This comparative study between Opioid free anesthesia (OFA) and Opioid anesthesia (OA) aims to compare the effect of both techniques on intra operative hemodynamics, intracranial tension and recovery in cranial surgeries for supratentorial tumors.

After obtaining an informed written consent from the patients or their responsible relative, patients will be divided into 2 groups randomly using computer software (research randomizer.org); Opioid free Anesthesia group (OFA) and Opioid Anesthesia group (OA). To assure blindness, numbers will be concealed by closed envelope, analgesic infusions will prepared by a clinical pharmacist not included in data collection and the attending anesthetist will be blinded to the type of analgesic solution injected.

Over 10 minutes prior to induction of analgesia patients in the OFA group will receive small doses of demedetomidine, ketamine, lidocaine and magnesium along with ketorlac and acetaminophen. an infusion afterwards will be administered through the operation containing dexmedetomidine, ketamine and lidocaine. In the OA group, over 10 minutes, patients will receive a loading dose of fentanyl followed by fentanyl infusion through the operation. General anesthesia will be induced using the same drugs and the same parameters in both groups after the completion of the initial analgesic infusions The primary outcome parameter will be the percentage of patients experiencing hemodynamic instability at Burr Hole (defined as recording an increase or decrease of the mean arterial blood pressure by 25 % of the baseline reading) Assuming the rate of hemodynamic instability (defined as increase or decrease of the mean blood pressure by 25 % of the baseline reading) would be 40 % in the control arm, a clinically meaningful reduction of the rate of hemodynamic instability to 10 % in the investigational arm with a statistical power of 80 % and an alpha error of less than 0.05 would require recruiting 29 patients in each group (a total of 58 patients).

Continuous data will be presented as mean + (SD). Categorical variables will be represented as frequencies and percentages. According to the type of data Comparison between the two groups will be performed using either Chi square test or Fisher's exact test. Hemodynamic variables will be compared to baseline using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc scheffe's test for positive data. P values less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Opioid Free VS Opioid Anesthesia for Craniotomies

Hemodynamic Effects of Opioid Free Anesthesia Versus Opioid Anesthesia on Adult Patients Undergoing Craniotomies for Supratentorial Tumors. Randomized Controlled Trial

Defined as recording an increase or decrease of the mean arterial blood pressure by more than 25 % from baseline readings at the time of burr hole

Hemodynamic parameter recorded during the study

Defined as 1= excellently relaxed, 2= satisfactory relaxed, 3= leveled, 4=bulging

Number of patients needing nitroglycerine infusion in each group was recorded together with total amount infused

Number of patients needing ephedrine in each group was recorded together with total amount infused.

Defined as the time between the discontinuation of inhalation agents and extubation

to assess the postoperative sedation, it is a scale from 1 to 6. It provides three levels of 'awake' states (score 1-3) and three levels of 'asleep' states (score 4-6). A score of 2 (patient is cooperative, orientated and tranquil)

Kasr El Aini Hospital

Assistant professor of Anesthesia, ICU and pain medicine

Natriuretic Agents

Mannitol

Diuretics

in this group, Mannitol (1.0g/kg) is given just after the induction of general anesthesia

in this group, Mannitol (1.0g/kg) is given at the time of skin incision

This drug is in our routine use of neuroanesthesia, are given for facilitate brain relaxation

Although mannitol is used for brain relaxation during neurosurgery and in the treatment of raised intracranial pressure; there is not a consensus on its safe, effective dose and the duration of its administration. This study aimed to compare the effects of the mannitol in different use times, on the brain relaxation, electrolyte, lactate levels of the blood, peroperative fluid balance and the volume of the urine in supratentorial mass resection surgeries.

The Therapeutic Time Window of Mannitol During Craniotomy for Optimal Brain Relaxation in Patients With Supratentorial Tumours

Brain Relaxation Facilitated by Mannitol in Craniotomy: Insight Into the Optimized Operation Window

difference in brain relaxation after drug administration

The assessment was performed using a 4-point scale,

1 denoting bulging or the condition that additional methods for brain relaxation are immediately and always required in order to continue the surgical procedure because of brain swelling;

2, firm or the condition that additional methods for brain relaxation are occasionally required to continue the surgical procedure;

3, adequate; 4, perfectly relaxed.

In all patients, the degree of brain relaxation was assessed at the time of dural opening and satisfactory brain relaxation was defined as a brain relaxation score of 3 or 4.

All the Secondary Outcome Measures below are observed the safety for intraoperative brain debulking during elective supratentorial craniotomy

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization
Small-dose Dexmedetomidine Effects on Recovery Profiles of Supratentorial Tumors Patients From General Anesthesia	NCT02007798	Brain Neoplasms Surgery	dexmedetomidine normal saline	35 Years - 65 Years	China Medical University, China
Opioid Free VS Opioid Anesthesia for Craniotomies	NCT04941040	Supratentorial ...	Opioid free ane... Opioid Anesthet...	18 Years - 60 Years	Kasr El Aini Hospital
The Therapeutic Time Window of Mannitol During Craniotomy for Optimal Brain Relaxation in Patients With Supratentorial Tumours	NCT03444519	Supratentorial ...	Mannitol	18 Years - 60 Years	Huashan Hospital
Opioid Free VS Opioid Anesthesia for Craniotomies	NCT04941040	Supratentorial ...	Opioid free ane... Opioid Anesthet...	18 Years - 60 Years	Kasr El Aini Hospital

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for supratentorial tumors