The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.
Brief Title: Veliparib and Temozolomide in Treating Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma
Official Title: A Randomized Phase I/II Study of ABT-888 in Combination With Temozolomide in Recurrent (Temozolomide Resistant) Glioblastoma
Study ID: NCT01026493
Brief Summary: RATIONALE: Veliparib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide. work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving veliparib together with temozolomide may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: This randomized phase I/II trial is studying the side effects and best dose of giving veliparib together with temozolomide and to see how well it works in treating patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
Detailed Description: OBJECTIVES: Primary * To define the maximum-tolerated dose of the combination of temozolomide and veliparib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma previously or not treated with temozolomide. (Phase I\*) * To determine the efficacy of the combination of temozolomide and veliparib (using a 5-day vs 21-day schedule) as measured by the 6-month progression-free survival rate in patients with recurrent glioblastoma previously treated with temozolomide. (Phase II\*) Secondary * To characterize the safety profile of the combination of temozolomide and veliparib. (Phase I\*) * To determine the adverse event profile and tolerability of the combination of temozolomide and veliparib (using a 5-day vs 21-day schedule) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. (Phase II\*) * To determine the efficacy of the combination of temozolomide and veliparib (using a 5-day vs 21-day schedule) as measured by objective response in patients with measurable disease. (Phase II\*) * To determine the overall survival of patients treated with the combination of temozolomide and veliparib (using a 5-day vs 21-day schedule). (Phase II\*) Note: \*Phase I was closed and phase II was opened on 3/6/12. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, phase I\* dose-escalation study followed by a phase II\* randomized study. Patients enrolled in the phase II portion are stratified according to bevacizumab (BEV) status (bevacizumab-naive vs bevacizumab-failure), age (\< 50 years vs ≥ 50 years), Karnofsky performance status (70-80% vs 90-100%), and recent resection (yes vs no/biopsy only). * Phase I:\* Patients receive oral temozolomide once daily and oral veliparib twice daily on days 1-21. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. * Phase II:\* Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients receive temozolomide and veliparib as in phase I. * Arm II: Patients receive oral temozolomide once daily and oral veliparib twice daily on days 1-5. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 12 weeks for 1 year, every 26 weeks for 2 years, and then annually thereafter. Note: \*Phase I was closed and phase II was opened on 3/6/12. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 240 patients (28 for phase I\* and 212 for phase II\*) will be accrued for this study.
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Eligible Ages: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Sex: ALL
Healthy Volunteers: No
Rebecca and John Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
Leeward Radiation Oncology, 'Ewa Beach, Hawaii, United States
Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
Queen's Cancer Institute at Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
Hawaii Medical Center - East, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States
CCOP - Kansas City, Prairie Village, Kansas, United States
Central Baptist Hospital, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Louisville Oncology at Norton Cancer Institute - Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Regional Cancer Center at Singing River Hospital, Pascagoula, Mississippi, United States
Renown Institute for Cancer at Renown Regional Medical Center, Reno, Nevada, United States
Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Cancer Institute of New Jersey at UMDNJ - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Highland Hospital of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States
James P. Wilmot Cancer Center at University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States
Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Portland, Oregon, United States
Name: H. Ian Robins, MD, PhD
Affiliation: University of Wisconsin, Madison
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Name: Mark R Gilbert, MD
Affiliation: National Cancer Institute/National Institutes of Health
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Name: Arnab Chakravarti, MD
Affiliation: Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University Medical School
Role: STUDY_CHAIR