Neoplasms

All Conditions

Digestive System Diseases

Gland and Hormone Related Diseases

Urinary Tract, Sexual Organs, and Pregnancy Conditions

Rare Diseases

Carcinoma

Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic Neoplasms

Ovarian Neoplasms

Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial

Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous

Cystadenocarcinoma

Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial

Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Digestive System Neoplasms

Endocrine Gland Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Diseases

Pancreatic Diseases

Endocrine System Diseases

Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous

Pancreatic Cancer

Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian Epithelial Cancer

Adenocarcinoma of the Appendix

Anti-Infective Agents

All Drugs and Chemicals

Antineoplastic Agents

Piperazine

Mebendazole

Piperazine citrate

DMP 777

Palbociclib

Protein Kinase Inhibitors

Enzyme Inhibitors

Patients receive palbociclib PO QD on days 1-21 and binimetinib PO BID on days 1-28 of each cycle. throughout the trial. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for up to 3 years. Patients may also undergo biopsy at screening and undergo MRI, CT, bone scan, and collection of blood samples during screening, on study, and/or during follow up.

Patients receive binimetinib PO BID daily, in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, for up to 3 years. Patients who experience disease progression may elect to migrate to the combination cohort. Patients may also undergo biopsy at screening and undergo MRI, CT, bone scan, and collection of blood samples during screening, on study, and/or during follow up.

Binimetinib

Biopsy

Biospecimen Collection

Bone Scan

Computed Tomography

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Site Public Contact

Rebecca C. Arend

Ahmed Abdalla

Thomas J. George

John M. Schallenkamp

Alison K. Conlin

Bryan A. Faller

Devalingam Mahalingam

Thomas E. Lad

Ardaman Shergill

Maria T. Grosse-Perdekamp

Richard L. Deming

Deborah W. Wilbur

Joshua Lukenbill

Susanne M. Arnold

Leslie S. Bradford

Sarah J. Sinclair

Sarah E. Taylor

Tareq Al Baghdadi

Kathleen J. Yost

Dana Zakalik

Daniel Almquist

Bret E. Friday

Premal H. Thaker

Geoffrey I Shapiro

This phase II ComboMATCH treatment trial evaluates the effectiveness of palbociclib and binimetinib in treating patients with RAS-mutated cancers. Palbociclib and binimetinib are both in a class of medications called kinase inhibitors. They work by blocking the action of abnormal proteins that signals cancer cells to multiply. This trial may help researchers understand if giving the combination of palbociclib and binimetinib can help improve the amount of time before the cancer grows in patients with patients with low grade serous ovarian cancer who have certain changes in the tumor DNA. This trial may also help researchers understand if giving the combination of palbociclib and binimetinib can help improve outcomes among patients with low grade serous ovarian cancer who have previously received a MEK inhibitor. For patients with other tumors, with the exception of lung cancer, colon cancer, melanoma and low grade serous ovarian cancers, this trial may help researchers understand if giving the combination of palbociclib and binimetinib can improve the clinical outcome of survival without progression in patients who have certain changes in their tumor's DNA.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine whether palbociclib and binimetinib combination therapy improves progression free survival (PFS) compared to binimetinib alone in patients with MEK-inhibitor naive low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) harboring MAP kinase activation (KRAS/NRAS/non BRAF V600E mutation). (Cohort 1) II. To determine whether palbociclib and binimetinib improves clinical activity in comparison to historical control, as measured by objective response rate (ORR), in women with LGSOC whose disease has previously progressed on a MEK inhibitor. (Cohort 2) III. To determine whether palbociclib and binimetinib combination therapy improves the objective response rate compared to historical control in patients with pancreatic cancer harboring any KRAS/NRAS/HRAS mutation or non-BRAF V600E aMOIs or rare RAF fusion. (Cohort 3) IV. To determine whether palbociclib and binimetinib combination therapy improves objective response rate compared to historical control in patients with tumors harboring any KRAS/NRAS/HRAS mutations or non-BRAF V600E aMOIs or rare RAF fusions (excluding LGSOC, non-small cell lung cancer \[NSCLC\], colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer and melanoma). (Cohort 4)

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine whether palbociclib and binimetinib combination therapy improves objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and disease control rate (DCR) compared to binimetinib alone in patients with MEK inhibitor-naïve LGSOC. (Cohort 1) II. Conduct whole-exome sequencing to evaluate concordance with the designated laboratory result. (Cohort 1) III. To assess the clinical activity of palbociclib and binimetinib as measured by PFS, OS, DOR, and DCR in women with LGSOC whose disease has previously progressed on a MEK inhibitor. (Cohort 2) IV. Conduct whole-exome sequencing to evaluate concordance with the designated laboratory result. (Cohort 2) V. To assess the clinical activity of palbociclib and binimetinib as measured by PFS, OS, DOR, and DCR in patients with RAS mutated pancreatic cancer. (Cohort 3) VI. Conduct whole-exome sequencing to evaluate concordance with the designated laboratory result. (Cohort 3) VII. To assess the clinical activity of palbociclib and binimetinib as measured by PFS, OS, DOR, and DCR in patients with RAS mutated cancers, excluding LGSOC, NSCLC, colorectal cancer (CRC), pancreatic cancer and melanoma. (Cohort 4) VIII. Conduct whole-exome sequencing to evaluate concordance with the designated laboratory result. (Cohort 4)

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. Explore thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) activity in response to palbociclib. (Cohort 1) II. Assess the correlation between presence of KRAS mutation and activity of both monotherapy and the combination. (Cohort 1) III. Conduct ribonucleic acid (RNA)-sequencing (seq) to assess determinants of response and resistance. (Cohort 1) IV. Explore changes in plasma RAS allelic burden in KRAS-mutated tumors using circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) and correlate changes with clinical activity. (Cohort 1) V. Explore TK1 activity in response to palbociclib.(Cohort 2) VI. Assess the correlation between presence of KRAS mutation and activity of the combination. (Cohort 2) VII. Conduct RNA-seq to assess determinants of response and resistance. (Cohort 2) VIII. Explore changes in plasma RAS allelic burden in KRAS-mutated tumors using ctDNA and correlate changes with clinical activity. (Cohort 2) IX. Explore TK1 activity in response to palbociclib. (Cohort 3) X. Evaluate changes in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), RNA and ctDNA to evaluate concordance with the designated laboratory result and to assess determinants of response, signatures of intrinsic resistance or response and the plasma RAS allelic burden in relation to treatment response, respectively. (Cohort 3) XI. Explore TK1 activity in response to palbociclib. (Cohort 4) XII. Evaluate changes in DNA, RNA and ctDNA to evaluate concordance with the designated laboratory result and to assess determinants of response, signatures of intrinsic resistance or response and the plasma RAS allelic burden in relation to treatment response, respectively. (Cohort 4)

OUTLINE: Patients with KRAS, NRAS, non-BRAF V600E aMOIs or rare RAF fusions LGSOC, naïve to MEK or CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy are randomized to either combination cohort 1 or monotherapy cohort 1. Patients with LGSOC who have received prior MEK inhibitor therapy are assigned to combination cohort 2. Patients with KRAS/NRAS/HRAS/non-V600E a MOIs or rare RAF fusion pancreatic cancer are assigned to combination cohort 3. Patients with all other KRAS/NRAS/HRAS, non -BRAF V600E a MOIs or rare FAR fusion tumor types (excluding LGSOC, NSCLC, CRC, pancreatic, and melanoma) are assigned to combination cohort 4.

COMBINATION COHORTS 1, 2, 3, 4: Patients receive palbociclib orally (PO), once per day (QD) on days 1-21 and binimetinib PO twice per day (BID) on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for up to 3 years. Patients may also undergo biopsy at screening and undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), bone scan, and collection of blood samples during screening, on study, and/or during follow up.

MONOTHERAPY COHORT 1: Patients receive binimetinib PO BID daily, in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, for up to 3 years. Patients who experience disease progression may elect to migrate to the combination cohort. Patients may also undergo biopsy at screening and undergo MRI, CT, bone scan, and collection of blood samples during screening, on study, and/or during follow up.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for up to 3 years following registration.

Palbociclib and Binimetinib in RAS-Mutant Cancers, A ComboMATCH Treatment Trial

Palbociclib and Binimetinib in RAS-Mutant Cancers: A ComboMATCH Treatment Trial

NCI is committed to sharing data in accordance with NIH policy. For more details on how clinical trial data is shared, access the link to the NIH data sharing policy page.

Will explore TK1 activity before vs. after treatment and how this corresponds and correlates to clinical outcomes after treatment with palbociclib.

Will characterize patients based on presence of KRAS mutations and how these correspond to efficacy outcomes such as PFS and response to treatment. Further, for cohort 1, will also evaluate how presence of this mutation influences outcomes in patients treated with monotherapy vs. the combination therapy. If numbers are sufficient, will also explore if KRAS mutation has any role as an effect modifier in this setting.

Will conduct whole-exome sequencing and ribonucleic acid (RNA)-sequencing at baseline, and on optional biopsy upon progression to assess determinants of response and resistance. For cohort 1, concordance of diagnostic tumor mutation profile generated by the designated laboratory, the pre-treatment biopsy mutation profile, and the pre-treatment circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) mutation profile will be assessed.

Will explore changes in plasma RAS allelic burden in KRAS-mutated tumors using ctDNA and correlate changes with clinical activity.

Will evaluate change in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), RNA, and ctDNA. Concordance of diagnostic tumor mutation profile generated by the designated laboratory, the pre-treatment biopsy mutation profile, and the pre-treatment ctDNA mutation profile will be assessed.

Will evaluate change in DNA, RNA, and ctDNA. Concordance of diagnostic tumor mutation profile generated by the designated laboratory, the pre-treatment biopsy mutation profile, and the pre-treatment ctDNA mutation profile will be assessed.

Will compare the PFS distributions between those treated with palbociclib and binimetinib vs. binimetinib alone. PFS will be compared between the two treatment arms using Kaplan-Meier methods. The hazard ratio, median PFS, and estimated PFS rates at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months will be estimated along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. A log-rank test will be used to compare the PFS distributions between the two treatment arms in this cohort. In an ancillary manner, Cox proportional hazards models will also be used to assess the impact of treatment arm on PFS when stratifying on the stratification factors.

The Simon optimal design used to evaluate efficacy in terms of the objective response rate after treatment in this population will use a two-stage design.

The Simon minimax design used to evaluate efficacy in terms of the objective response rate after treatment in this population will use a two-stage design.

The Simon minimax design used to evaluate efficacy in terms of the objective response rate after treatment in this histology/tumor agnostic population will use a two-stage design.

Objective response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1 criteria will be estimated using ORR where ORR is defined as the number of evaluable patients achieving a response (partial response \[PR\] or complete response \[CR\] per RECIST v1.1) during treatment with study therapy divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Rates of response will be compared between treatment arms using a chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test as needed). Point estimates will be generated for objective response rates within each arm along with 95% confidence intervals using the Clopper-Pearson method.

Disease progression will be determined based on RECIST 1.1 criteria. PFS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median PFS and corresponding 95% confidence interval will be reported. Patients will be censored at the last disease assessment date if they were alive and progression-free at the time of their last assessment.

Patients who are alive at last follow-up will be censored at that time point. The distribution of OS will be estimated using method of Kaplan-Meier. The median OS and 95% confidence interval will be reported.

DoR is defined for all evaluable patients who have achieved an objective response as time from the patient's earliest best objective status is first noted as either a CR or PR to the earliest date progression is documented, or death if no prior evidence of disease progression. The distribution of DoR will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.

Disease control will be estimated using disease control rate (DCR), which is defined as the patients who experience CR or PR per RECIST 1.1 or maintain stable disease for at least 6 months after randomization divided by the total number of evaluable patients. DCR will be evaluated within cohorts, and for cohort 1 this will also be compared between treatment arms using a chi square test. Point estimates will be generated for disease control rates within each arm along with 95% confidence intervals using the Clopper-Pearson method.

All eligible patients that have initiated treatment will be considered evaluable for assessing AE rate(s). Patients will be evaluated for adverse events using the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The maximum grade for each type of AE will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine patterns. Additionally, the relationship of the AE(s) to the study treatment will be taken into consideration.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Fallopian Tube Neoplasms

Peritoneal Neoplasms

Ovarian Diseases

Adnexal Diseases

Genital Diseases, Female

Genital Diseases

Urogenital Diseases

Female Urogenital Diseases

Pregnancy Complications

Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications

Genital Neoplasms, Female

Urogenital Neoplasms

Gonadal Disorders

Fallopian Tube Diseases

Abdominal Neoplasms

Peritoneal Diseases

Fallopian Tube Cancer

Paclitaxel

Carboplatin

Letrozole

Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel

Tubulin Modulators

Antimitotic Agents

Aromatase Inhibitors

Estrogens

Estrogen Antagonists

Estrogen Receptor Antagonists

Hormones

Hormone Antagonists

Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours and carboplatin IV on day 1. Cycles repeat every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. Patients then receive letrozole PO QD in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo blood collection and tumor biopsy during screening as well as medical imaging throughout the study.

Patients receive letrozole PO QD. Cycles repeat every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. Patients then receive letrozole orally PO QD in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as maintenance therapy. Patients undergo blood collection and tumor biopsy during screening as well as medical imaging throughout the study.

Imaging Technique

Nitya Alluri

Nicholas DiBella

John H. Farley

John A. Ellerton

Shahzad Siddique

Setsuko K. Chambers

Jay W. Carlson

David B. Engle

Heather R. Williams

Ramey D. Littell

Deepti Behl

Mihae Song

Yevgeniya J. Ioffe

Lee-May Chen

Amanda N Fader

This phase III trial studies how well letrozole with or without paclitaxel and carboplatin works in treating patients with stage II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum. Letrozole is an enzyme inhibitor that lowers the amount of estrogen made by the body which in turn may stop the growth of tumor cells that need estrogen to grow. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel and carboplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether giving letrozole alone or in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin works better in treating patients with low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum compared to paclitaxel and carboplatin without letrozole.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To examine if letrozole monotherapy/maintenance (L/L) is non-inferior to intravenous (IV) paclitaxel/carboplatin and maintenance letrozole (CT/L) with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) in women with stage II-IV primary low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum after primary surgical cytoreduction.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the nature, frequency and maximum degree of toxicity as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 5.0 for each treatment arm.

II. To compare the relative frequency of objective tumor response in those with measurable disease after cytoreductive surgery for each treatment arm.

III. To compare overall survival for each treatment arm. IV. To compare the CT/L and L/L arms with respect to patients' adherence to letrozole therapy as measured by pill counts.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours and carboplatin IV on day 1. Cycles repeat every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. Patients then receive letrozole orally (PO) once daily (QD) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo blood collection and tumor biopsy during screening as well as medical imaging throughout the study.

ARM II: Patients receive letrozole PO QD. Cycles repeat every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. Patients then receive letrozole orally PO QD in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as maintenance therapy. Patients undergo blood collection and tumor biopsy during screening as well as medical imaging throughout the study.

After completion of study treatment/intervention, patients/participants are followed up every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months for 3 years, then annually thereafter.

Letrozole With or Without Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Treating Patients With Stage II-IV Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

A Randomized Phase III, Two-Arm Trial of Paclitaxel/Carboplatin/Maintenance Letrozole Versus Letrozole Monotherapy in Patients With Stage II-IV, Primary Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary or Peritoneum

The PFS comparison will be assessed at the second interim and final analyses using a logrank test stratified by country and residual disease status. Estimates for the letrozole/letrozole (L/L) vs paclitaxel/carboplatin/letrozole (CT/L) hazard ratio and its confidence interval will be obtained using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Potential confounding factors, including the stratification factors, performance status and self-declared racial designation will be considered in a final exploratory model. A forest plot of treatment hazard ratios with confidence intervals within subgroups will also be reported. PFS will be characterized by treatment group with Kaplan-Meier plots and estimates of the median PFS.

The nature, frequency and degree of toxicity will be tabulated at the System Organ Class and AE Term levels using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Each patient will be represented according the maximum grade observed for each term, within randomized treatment assignment. Tabulations will show the number and percentage of patients by maximum grade, within their randomized treatment assignment.

Will be estimated as the binomial proportion of patients with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) among patients with measurable disease after cytoreductive surgery. Response rates and their 95% Wilson-Score confidence intervals will be estimated for each treatment arm, using the randomized treatment assignment. The odds-ratio for ORR in the L/L vs CT/L arms will be estimated from the multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for stratification factors.

Will be defined among patients with best overall response of CR or PR. Comparison of response duration between the randomized treatment arms will be supported by Kaplan Meier methods, and the corresponding estimates for median duration and its 95% confidence intervals.

Differences in OS across the randomized treatment groups will be assessed using Kaplan Meier methods, with median time to death estimates and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. The L/L vs CT/L hazard ratio will be estimated by a proportional hazards model stratified by the randomization stratification factors.

Will be quantified as the mean rate of adherence (MRA), calculated as the proportion of product not returned divided by the number of days since the previous visit at which study products were dispensed. Currently, the letrozole is delivered in a 2.5 mg pill, and the recommended dose is 2.5 mg per day. This outcome will be computed for each treatment cycle (generally 21 days). The mean MRA will be compared between the randomized treatment groups using linear mixed model methods. The model will be specified with a random patient effect, and fixed effects for randomized treatment indicator, time (cycle number) and the interaction, with an adjustment for the protocol stratification factors. Primary interest is in the difference in mean (MRA) at cycles 1, 6 and 12 between the treatment group. The results will be reported as the estimated mean (MRA) and 95% confidence intervals for each treatment/time combination. Treatment differences within stratification factors may also be considered.

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization
Palbociclib and Binimetinib in RAS-Mutant Cancers, A ComboMATCH Treatment Trial	NCT05554367	Malignant Solid... Ovarian Low Gra... Pancreatic Carc... Stage IV Ovaria... Stage IV Pancre...	Binimetinib Biopsy Biospecimen Col... Bone Scan Computed Tomogr... Magnetic Resona... Palbociclib	18 Years -	National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Palbociclib and Binimetinib in RAS-Mutant Cancers, A ComboMATCH Treatment Trial	NCT05554367	Malignant Solid... Ovarian Low Gra... Pancreatic Carc... Stage IV Ovaria... Stage IV Pancre...	Binimetinib Biopsy Biospecimen Col... Bone Scan Computed Tomogr... Magnetic Resona... Palbociclib	18 Years -	National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Letrozole With or Without Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Treating Patients With Stage II-IV Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer	NCT04095364	Low Grade Fallo... Ovarian Low Gra... Primary Periton... Stage II Fallop... Stage II Ovaria... Stage II Primar... Stage III Fallo... Stage III Ovari... Stage III Prima... Stage IV Fallop... Stage IV Ovaria... Stage IV Primar...	Biopsy Biospecimen Col... Carboplatin Imaging Techniq... Letrozole Paclitaxel	18 Years -	NRG Oncology

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for ovarian low grade serous adenocarcinoma