Neoplasms

Digestive System Diseases

All Conditions

Symptoms and General Pathology

Behaviors and Mental Disorders

Rectal Neoplasms

Syndrome

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

Anastomotic Leak

Colorectal Neoplasms

Intestinal Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Digestive System Neoplasms

Gastrointestinal Diseases

Intestinal Diseases

Rectal Diseases

Postoperative Complications

Colonic Diseases

Quality of Life

patients receive coloanal anastomosis operation

patients receive coloanal pull-out anastomosis operation

compare different operational styles of low rectal cancer

Parks technique

Bacon technique

Jun Huang, MD

Jun Huang

The goal of this study is to compare the postoperative anal function of patients with ultra-low rectal cancer after Parks operation (colon anal anastomosis) and Bacon operation (colon anal pull-out anastomosis), which may provide clinical evidence for the improvement of anal function and quality of life.

The main questions it aims to answer are: the difference of anal function 1 year after surgery type of study: clinical trial participant population: patients with low rectal cancer Participants will receive Parks operation of Bacon operation If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare Parks and Bacon operation to see if the anal function 1 year after surgery is different.

objective: To compare the postoperative anal function of patients with ultra-low rectal cancer after Parks operation (colon anal anastomosis) and Bacon operation (colon anal pull-out anastomosis), which may provide clinical evidence for the improvement of anal function and quality of life.

primary outcome: Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score 1 year after surgery secondary outcomes: 1. LARS score at 3 months after surgery 2. LARS score at 6 months after surgery 3. Postoperative Quality of Life Score 4. The incidence of postoperative anastomotic complications

Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Parks and Bacon Techniques in Low Rectal Cancer

Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Different Anastomosis Techniques(Parks Versus Bacon) in Low Rectal Cancer: A Prospective, Multicentric and Randomized Controlled Study

use a scoring system for bowel dysfunction after LAR for rectal cancer on the basis of symptoms and impact on quality of life

using a score system to access the quality of life after surgery

the corresponding complications after surgery

Study title	NCT ID	Conditions	Interventions	Eligibility	Organization	Link
Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Parks and Bacon Techniques in Low Rectal Cancer	NCT05943444	Rectal Neoplasm... Low Anterior Re... Anastomotic Lea... Quality of Life	Parks technique Bacon technique	18 Years - 75 Years	Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Parks and Bacon Techniques in Low Rectal Cancer	NCT05943444	Rectal Neoplasm... Low Anterior Re... Anastomotic Lea... Quality of Life	Parks technique Bacon technique	18 Years - 75 Years	Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for parks technique