Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Parks and Bacon Techniques in Low Rectal Cancer

The following info and data is provided "as is" to help patients around the globe.
We do not endorse or review these studies in any way.

Trial Identification

Brief Title: Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Parks and Bacon Techniques in Low Rectal Cancer

Official Title: Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Different Anastomosis Techniques(Parks Versus Bacon) in Low Rectal Cancer: A Prospective, Multicentric and Randomized Controlled Study

Study ID: NCT05943444

Conditions

Rectal Neoplasms

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

Anastomotic Leak

Quality of Life

Interventions

Parks technique

Bacon technique

Study Description

Brief Summary: The goal of this study is to compare the postoperative anal function of patients with ultra-low rectal cancer after Parks operation (colon anal anastomosis) and Bacon operation (colon anal pull-out anastomosis), which may provide clinical evidence for the improvement of anal function and quality of life. The main questions it aims to answer are: the difference of anal function 1 year after surgery type of study: clinical trial participant population: patients with low rectal cancer Participants will receive Parks operation of Bacon operation If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare Parks and Bacon operation to see if the anal function 1 year after surgery is different.

Detailed Description: objective: To compare the postoperative anal function of patients with ultra-low rectal cancer after Parks operation (colon anal anastomosis) and Bacon operation (colon anal pull-out anastomosis), which may provide clinical evidence for the improvement of anal function and quality of life. primary outcome: Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score 1 year after surgery secondary outcomes: 1. LARS score at 3 months after surgery 2. LARS score at 6 months after surgery 3. Postoperative Quality of Life Score 4. The incidence of postoperative anastomotic complications