Symptoms and General Pathology

All Conditions

Neoplasms

Blood and Lymph Conditions

Immune System Diseases

Rare Diseases

Recurrence

Leukemia

Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

Leukemia, Lymphoid

Lymphoma

Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin

Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Lymphatic Diseases

Immunoproliferative Disorders

Hematologic Diseases

Disease Attributes

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

Lymphosarcoma

Acute Graft Versus Host Disease

Micronutrients

All Drugs and Chemicals

Anti-Infective Agents

Antineoplastic Agents

Antirheumatic Agents

Dermatologic Agents

Reproductive Control Agents

Hematinics

Bone Density Conservation Agents

Vitamins

Leucovorin

Cytarabine

Cyclophosphamide

Levoleucovorin

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin

Methotrexate

Vincristine

Calcium

Pegaspargase

Folic Acid

Calcium, Dietary

Asparaginase

Asparaginase erwinia chrysanthemi, recombinant-rywn

Vitamin B Complex

Immunosuppressive Agents

Immunologic Factors

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating

Alkylating Agents

Hormones

Antimetabolites

Enzyme Inhibitors

Folic Acid Antagonists

Antiviral Agents

Antidotes

Protective Agents

Trace Elements

Tubulin Modulators

Antimitotic Agents

Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological

Anti-Bacterial Agents

Antibiotics, Antitubercular

Immunotoxins

Immunoconjugates

Folinic Acid

Folate

Vitamin B9

Patients receive inotuzumab ozogamicin IV over 60 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. (COMPLETE)

Asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi

Biospecimen Collection

Undergo a bone marrow aspiration and biopsy

Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy

Calaspargase Pegol

Diagnostic Imaging

Leucovorin Calcium

Lumbar Puncture

Site Public Contact

Matthew A. Kutny

Brenda J. Wittman

Joseph C. Torkildson

Dana B. Salzberg

David L. Becton

Robert M. Cooper

Deepa Bhojwani

Nicole M. Baca

Jennifer G. Michlitsch

Aarati V. Rao

Elyssa M. Rubin

Jay Michael S. Balagtas

Yung S. Yim

Marcio H. Malogolowkin

William D. Roberts

Elliot Stieglitz

Kelly W. Maloney

Jennifer J. Clark

Michael S. Isakoff

Emi H. Caywood

Jeffrey S. Dome

Emad K. Salman

William B. Slayton

Iftikhar Hanif

Maggie E. Fader

Fouad M. Hajjar

Andrew J. Galligan

Matthew D. Ramirez

Melinda G. Pauly

Andrew L. Pendleton

Wade T. Kyono

Martha M. Pacheco

Joanna L. Weinstein

Gabrielle Lapping-Carr

Eugene Suh

Prerna Kumar

Gregory P. Brandt

Sandeep Batra

Samantha L. Mallory

David S. Dickens

James T. Badgett

Ashok B. Raj

Lolie C. Yu

Craig Lotterman

Daniel L. Callaway

Eric C. Larsen

Jason M. Fixler

Kenneth J. Cohen

Melissa A. Burns

Stefanie R. Lowas

Emily B. Walling

Laura E. Agresta

Kathleen J. Yost

Laura K. Gowans

Michael K. Richards

Peter M. Gordon

Asmaa Ferdjallah

Betty L. Herrington

Barbara A. Gruner

Kevin F. Ginn

William S. Ferguson

Jeffrey A. Magee

Robin D. Hanson

Jill C. Beck

Don W. Coulter

Alan K. Ikeda

Angela Ricci

Burton E. Appel

Kathryn L. Laurie

Nibal A. Zaghloul

Archana Sharma

Teena Bhatla

Alissa Kahn

Lauren R. Weintraub

Alice Lee

Mahmut Y. Celiker

Clare J. Twist

Chana L. Glasser

Julie I. Krystal

Elizabeth A. Raetz

Pallavi M. Pillai

Kavitha Ramaswamy

Laura E. Hogan

Maureen M O'Brien

This phase II trial studies how well inotuzumab ozogamicin works in treating younger patients with B-lymphoblastic lymphoma or CD22 positive B acute lymphoblastic leukemia that has come back (relapsed) or does not respond to treatment (refractory). Inotuzumab ozogamicin is a monoclonal antibody, called inotuzumab, linked to a toxic agent called ozogamicin. Inotuzumab attaches to CD22 positive cancer cells in a targeted way and delivers ozogamicin to kill them.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To determine the morphologic response rate (complete response \[CR\] + complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery \[CRi\]) following one cycle of treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin in children with relapsed or refractory CD22+ B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). (Cohort 1)

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the CR/CRi rate following 2 cycles of inotuzumab ozogamicin therapy. (Cohort 1) II. To determine the safety of single agent inotuzumab ozogamicin administered at the adult recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) to pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory CD22+ B-ALL. (Cohort 1) III. To determine the level of minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry in responding patients. (Cohorts 1 and 2) IV. To determine the incidence, severity, and outcomes of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) of the liver in patients during inotuzumab ozogamicin therapy and following subsequent treatment, including myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). (Cohorts 1 and 2) V. To estimate the 3-year event-free survival (EFS), 3-year overall survival (OS), and among responders, duration of CR/CRi for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory B-ALL treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin. (Cohort 1) VI. To describe inotuzumab ozogamicin pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity in pediatric patients in the presence of overt leukemia and in remission. (Cohort 1) VII. To determine the safe and tolerable dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin in combination with the augmented modified Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (mBFM) consolidation chemotherapy backbone. (Cohort 2)

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To describe the levels of leukemic blast CD22 surface expression and site density, and to explore the correlation with cytogenetics and clinical outcomes after treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin. (Cohorts 1 and 2) II. To explore potential mechanisms of resistance to inotuzumab ozogamicin therapy including CD22 splice variants and intracellular signaling pathways. (Cohorts 1 and 2) III. To explore the impact of inotuzumab ozogamicin on humoral immune function and peripheral B cell populations. (Cohorts 1 and 2) IV. To describe the level of MRD by next-generation high-throughput sequencing (HTS) techniques which may detect low level leukemic blast populations that have altered CD22 expression. (Cohorts 1 and 2) V. To prospectively explore candidate SOS biomarkers including the endothelial marker of inflammation Angiopoietin 2 (Ang2) and the hepatic specific complement marker L-ficolin. (Cohorts 1 and 2) VI. To explore the use of prophylactic ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) to prevent hepatic damage and SOS during inotuzumab ozogamicin therapy and subsequent HSCT. (Cohorts 1 and 2) VII. To describe the interaction between inotuzumab ozogamicin and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy before or after treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin. (Cohorts 1 and 2) VIII. To estimate the CR/CRi rate following one cycle of inotuzumab ozogamicin plus augmented mBFM consolidation chemotherapy (first 42 days) and following 2 cycles within the confines of a pilot study. (Cohort 2)

OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts.

COHORT I: Patients receive inotuzumab ozogamicin intravenously (IV) over 60 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. (COMPLETE)

COHORT II: Patients receive inotuzumab ozogamicin IV over 60 minutes on days 1, and 8. Patients also receive cyclophosphamide IV over 30-60 on day 1; cytarabine IV over 1-30 minutes or subcutaneously (SC) on days 1-4 and 8-11; leucovorin calcium orally (PO) or IV on days 2, 9, 16, 23 and 37 of cycle 1 and days 9 and 37 of cycle 2; pegaspargase or calaspargase pegol IV over 1-2 hours or pegaspargase intramuscularly (IM) on day 15; and vincristine IV on days 15 and 22. Patients receive methotrexate intrathecally (IT) on days 1, 8 and 36 of cycle 1 and day 36 of cycle 2 for CNS 1 patients, days 1, 8, 15, 22 and 36 of cycle 1, and day 36 of cycle 2 for CNS 2 patients. CNS 3 patients receive methotrexate intrathecal triple therapy (ITT) IT on days 1, 8, 15, 22 and 36 of cycle 1 and days 8 and 36 of cycle 2. There are 3 dose levels. If excessive toxicity is observed at dose level 1, the dosing of inotuzumab ozogamicin will be decreased for dose level -1 and 6-mercaptopurine omitted. If excessive toxicity is observed at this dose, then for dose level -2, the dosing of inotuzumab ozogamicin and cyclophosphamide will be decreased. Treatment repeats every 42 days for up to 2 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration or biopsy, lumbar puncture, and blood sample collection throughout the trial. Patients also undergo imaging on screening and on study.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days, every 3 months for 1 year, and then yearly for 4 years.

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Treating Younger Patients With B-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma or Relapsed or Refractory CD22 Positive B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

A Phase 2 Study of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (NSC# 772518) in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory CD22+ B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)

Exploratory analysis of CD22 will focus primarily on the comparison of paired pre-treatment and post-treatment samples at the following times, 1) End of cycle 1 and 2) at relapse to evaluate for changes in CD22 expression pre and post-inotuzumab ozogamicin. Specifically, samples will be evaluated for change in CD22 expression that occurs over time to study the role of CD22 expression as it relates to resistance to therapy or mechanism for relapse. Correlation between changes in CD22 expression and patient's clinical response to inotuzumab ozogamicin as well as cytogenetic/molecular features will be described, in particular to explore the association of CD22-negative subpopulations in patients with KMT2A-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Exploratory analysis of CD22 will focus primarily on the comparison of paired pre-treatment and post-treatment samples at the following times, 1) End of cycle 1 and 2) at relapse to evaluate for changes in CD22 site density pre and post-inotuzumab ozogamicin. Samples will be evaluated for any change in CD22 site density that occurs over time and to evaluate for the emergence of a CD22 "dim" or "negative" population to study the role of CD22 site density as it relates to resistance to therapy or mechanism for relapse. Correlation between changes in CD22 site density and patient's clinical response to inotuzumab ozogamicin as well as cytogenetic/molecular features will be described, in particular to explore the association of CD22-negative subpopulations in patients with KMT2A-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Will be analyzed by ribonucleic acid-sequencing (RNA-Seq). The MAJIQ and VOILA software will be used to identify splicing variations in CD22 from RNA Seq and to quantitate the percent spliced in (PSI) of the alternative exons. CD22 protein levels will be determined by immunoblotting of whole cell protein lysates using several anti-CD22 antibodies recognizing either extracellular or intracellular domains. Both protein sizes and preservation of individual epitopes will be assessed and correlated with alterations in exon inclusion.

Peripheral blood samples will be evaluated by comprehensive protein profiling using CyTOF panels for the two major areas of analyses, surface immunophenotyping to assess the developmental stage of both normal and abnormal B cells and measure their responses to inotuzumab ozogamicin , as well as intracellular epitopes to assess the cellular consequences of treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin. Exploratory analysis will be performed using Cytobank software tools (viSNE, SPADE and CITRUS) for subpopulations clustering, dimensionality reduction and hierarchical organization.

Descriptive statistics will be used to characterize patterns of B-cell development including selective loss of subsets. Changes in B cell number and subsets will be described, and exploratory analysis will be conducted to assess their correlation with clinical features including immunoglobulin levels, occurrence of infections, and need for intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) replacement during inotuzumab ozogamicin therapy.

Compared to MRD measured by flow cytometry. MRD levels at each bone marrow evaluation time point will be measured by standard flow cytometry (MRD-negative defined as \< 0.01% or 1 leukemic cell in 10-4 nucleated cells). At the end of cycles 1 and 2, MRD will also be assessed by HTS. The correlation between the measurements with each technique will be described and the sensitivity of flow-based MRD methodology in the setting of CD22-targeted therapy will be explored.

Correlated with clinical development of SOS. Descriptive statistics will be used to characterize clinical features of patients experiencing SOS. L-ficolin and Ang2 absolute levels and change in level over time with inotuzumab ozogamicin exposure will be evaluated and correlated with development of SOS. Biomarker levels will be compared using simple comparative statistics between subgroups.

Descriptive statistics will be used to characterize clinical features of patients experiencing SOS, potential clinical risk factors, and the impact of ursodeoxycholic acid prophylaxis.

Will be evaluated by incidence of hematologic DLT in patients with CAR-T therapy prior to inotuzumab ozogamicin, incidence of post-inotuzumab ozogamicin CAR-T therapy, time to CAR-T therapy after inotuzumab ozogamicin, and B-cell recovery prior to CAR-T therapy after inotuzumab ozogamicin. Will be summarized using descriptive statistics.

Will be estimated using the proportion of eligible/evaluable patients with CR/CRi response. Analysis will be mostly descriptive.

The response rate will be estimated using the proportion of eligible/evaluable patients with CR/CRi response. A one-sided lower 95% Agresti-Coull confidence limit will be calculated.

The response rate will be estimated using the proportion of eligible/evaluable patients with CR/CRi response.

Evaluated according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Toxicity tables will be constructed to summarize the observed incidence by type of toxicity and grade. For a given reporting period, a patient will be counted only once for a given toxicity for the worst grade of that toxicity reported for that patient.

MRD negativity rates (\< 0.01% detectable leukemia cells) will be estimated.

Evaluated according to NCI CTCAE version 5.0. The incidence of SOS of the liver in patients during inotuzumab ozogamicin therapy and following subsequent treatment including myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HSCT) will be described.

The EFS rate will be estimated using Kaplan Meier approach.

The OS rate will be estimated using Kaplan Meier approach.

Among responding patients, three-year complete continuous response will also be estimated using duration of CR/CRi for the overall responding group and stratified by whether or not the patients proceed to HSCT.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin trough levels (ng/mL) will be determined in serum by validated, high sensitivity liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS) assays. Descriptive summary statistics will be provided for the trough levels at scheduled visits for Cycles 1 and 2.

Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) and cell-based assays will be used to detect anti-drug antibodies and neutralizing antibodies to inotuzumab ozogamicin in serum. Inotuzumab ozogamicin trough levels will be compared between patients with and without antibodies.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Children's Oncology Group

Spots Global Cancer Trial Database for recurrent b lymphoblastic lymphoma